 |
Guess who received an invitation to a $500 a plate dinner with our illustrious Commander in Chief?
Give up?
ME!
That's right - your purple-haired, tattoo-sporting, nipple-pierced host was invited to attend a black-tie dinner in Washington D.C. to be addressed by George W. himself.
The invitation was in the form of a phone call from the office of Congressman Tom Reynolds,
chairman of the National Republican Congressional Committee.
Now, if you're the least bit familiar with my website then you might have some idea of how bewildered I was.
I am the last person you want in the same room as Bush - the very last.
It's not that I'm a Democrat per se, I'm just a pro choice, anti war, pro gay-rights, anti censorship, pro civil-liberty, anti corporation, pro environment,
anti SUV, pro sodomy, anti religion-shoved-down-my-throat, hedonist who would love nothing more than to humiliate the current President of the United States.
Here's how the phone conversation unfolded immediately after Congressman Reynolds' representative finished her spiel:
Rep: ...a mere $500 dollars.
Me: What?
Rep: The required donation is only $500 dollars, can we count you in Mr. Holdaway?
Me: Uh... no, I don't think so.
Rep: That's okay, Mr. Holdaway. We understand that this is short notice and that $500 might be tough to come up with, especially this soon after Christmas.
Would you be willing to donate a smaller amount, perhaps $100 or $200 dollars, to help make sure that our hard-won conservative majority will be able to push through all of the important
issues that we as Americans all support?
Me: No. Um, how did I get on your list?
Rep: Mr. Holdaway, you were selected as a leading business owner from the state of California.
Are you sure you wouldn't like to help us make American a better place by building upon our conservative-value majority?
Me: Definitely not. I voted against Bush.
Rep: Oh. (pause) So you're a Democrat?
Me: Um... yeah... sure... whatever. Could you please take me off of your list?
Rep: Certainly, Mr. Holdaway. Have a nice day. (click)
|
After hanging up the phone, I took a moment to ponder how it was that the NRCC thought I was a business owner (let alone a conservative!).
Perhaps they had me confused with my father - we share the same name and he is definitely a conservative.
It wouldn't be the first time someone had called me looking for my dad, but I didn't think that was the case.
First, they called my office number. Usually people looking for my father call my home number.
Second, my dad doesn't own a business either.
So I chuckled, shook my head and got up to tell others in the office what had transpired.
Immediately upon returning to my desk, the phone rang.
It was a telemarketer calling to ask if my business, Blue Star Folly, was still using stamps and if we were interested in switching to metered mail.
<CLICK>
The click of the phone meeting the receiver synchronized with the click in my head as the solution to the NRCC mystery presented itself.
Some spammer must have harvested my domain registration info, mistakenly assuming that it was a business, and sold that info to telemarketers.
Voilà!
I guess there isn't a moral to this story.
In retrospect, I should have acted like a conservative business owner and forked out the $500, just for a chance to play anarchist at a black-tie, presidential dinner.
Oh, well.
I'm sure that I'll have other, cheaper opportunities to be dragged off by security while screaming obscenities.
One can dream.
|
| - Lars |
| Visitor Comments |
(2005.01.12 23:24:16) - Comment by Abby Goldsmith (67.112.166.2) |
(2005.01.27 15:09:43) - Comment by Lori (64.191.147.226) |
(2005.01.27 20:18:57) - Comment by Lars ( webmaster ) |
(2005.02.17 21:29:25) - Comment by Lars ( webmaster ) |
(2005.02.28 21:08:43) - Comment by Crowell29a (24.199.128.222) |
(2005.03.30 20:16:49) - Comment by Batlady (65.127.6.84) |
(2005.04.25 20:44:26) - Comment by Matthew (18.56.0.36) |
(2005.06.14 21:02:46) - Comment by dolst (64.83.52.18) |
(2005.07.22 15:34:08) - Comment by Smitty (24.128.64.152) |
(2005.08.03 17:27:30) - Comment by Diana (65.31.77.59) |
(2005.08.09 11:33:00) - Comment by Scott (146.145.59.91) |
(2005.12.01 18:55:55) - Comment by mtglick (71.104.197.144) |
|
|
|
|
|
|